程序代写:网络欺凌

程序代写:网络欺凌

就研究而言,有好坏参半的证据。一些研究人员已经表明,传统的欺凌比网络欺凌具有更大的直接负面影响(Ortega et al. 2009)。相反,Hay, Meldrum和Mana(2010)认为,与传统的欺凌相比,网络伤害会导致更大的自我导向伤害,如自我伤害行为和自杀想法。史密斯在2012年报告称,某些类型的网络欺凌比传统的欺凌更有害。在照片和视频剪辑被用来欺负人的类别中,其后果对受害者更为不利。然而,当人们通过短信受到欺凌时,其负面影响与传统欺凌中所经历的一样强烈。另一方面,通过电子邮件进行的欺凌比传统形式的欺凌造成的不良后果要少。综上所述,可以说,对于哪种形式的欺凌更具伤害性,研究还没有得出一个实质性的结论。

还有一部分受网络欺凌的人并不觉得自己不受欺凌事件的困扰。在传统欺凌的受害者中,这一比例通常很低。在网络欺凌中,由于暴露不是直接的,受害者可能感觉不到虐待的感觉。在传统的欺凌中,受害者会受到直接的虐待,这是很难忽视的。这种暴露必然会产生一些负面影响。在传统的恃强凌弱中,会使用侮辱性的词语。此外,它还包括身体攻击或攻击。在传统的恃强凌弱中,涉及和刺激了各种各样的感官;因此,很难忽视这样的曝光,因此它必然会产生影响。回到网络欺凌这个话题,网络欺凌的本质会影响人们所经历的痛苦程度。手机欺凌比网络欺凌的负面影响更大,因为人们随身携带手机。因此,当他们通过手机被欺负的时候;他们可能会觉得无法逃避。然而,随着时间的推移,这一差距可能会逐渐缩小,因为现在的手机连接了互联网。现在,社交网站和电子邮件可以通过手机访问,一个非常复杂的通知系统已经出现。正因为如此,欺凌者几乎可以在瞬间接触到受害者。然而,对于传统的霸凌,你不能阻止霸凌者,因为这是霸凌者使用技术作为媒介的选择。

记住上面给出的论点,不能断言一种欺凌形式比另一种有更大的负面后果。影响的程度受许多因素的相互作用所控制,如用于欺负的平台、受欺负的时间长短、受欺负的强度和频率、所涉及的感官数量和手边的保护盾。网络欺凌最致命的因素是匿名性和缺乏传统欺凌的避风港;这是直接暴露在虐待之下。传统的恃强凌弱是直接针对受害者的。

综上所述,无论哪种形式的恃强凌弱者危害更大,这一点怎么强调都不为过;被欺负对受害者的心理健康是有害和灾难性的影响。恃强凌弱让人感觉很糟糕,需要加以遏制并严肃对待。

程序代写:网络欺凌

As far as research is concerned, there is mixed evidence. Some researchers have shown traditional bullying that is direct to have a greater negative impact than cyberbullying (Ortega et al. 2009). On the contrary, Hay, Meldrum and Mana (2010) believed that cyber victimization leads to greater self-directed harm such as self-hurting behaviors and suicidal thinking as compared to traditional bullying. Smith reported in 2012 that certain categories of cyberbullying are more harmful than the traditional bullying. In the categories, where photos and video clips are used to bully a person, the consequences are more adverse for the victims. However, when people are bullied through text messages than the negative consequences are just as intense as the ones experienced in traditional bullying. Bullying through emails, on the other hand, has less adverse consequences than traditional forms of bullying. Considering all of the researches quoted above, it can be said that researches have not been able to reach a substantial conclusion regarding which form of bullying is more injurious.

There is also a proportion of cyberbullied individuals who do not feel not bothered by the incidents of bullying. Such a proportion is usually low in victims of traditional bullying. In cyberbullying, since the exposure is not direct, the feeling of abuse may not be felt by the victims. In traditional bullying, the victim is exposed to direct abuse, which is too hard to ignore. Such exposure is bound to have some negative impact. In traditional bullying, abusive phrases are uttered. In addition, it also involves physical attacks or assault. In traditional bullying, a wide variety of senses are involved and stimulated; hence, it becomes difficult to ignore such an exposure so it is bound to have an impact. Coming back to cyberbullying, nature of cyberbullying has an impact on the level of distress experienced. Bullying experienced through cell phones tend to have more negative impact than bullying experienced on the internet, as people carry cell phones around everywhere. Therefore, when they are bullied through their mobile phones; they might feel that there is no escape from it. However, it is expected that this difference may diminish with time as cell phones are now coming laced with internet. Now social networking sites and emails can be accessed through mobiles, and a very sophisticated notification system is present. Due to this, bullies can reach to their victims almost instantaneously. However, with traditional bullying, you cannot block the bully as it is the option with bullying that use technology as a medium.

Keeping in mind the arguments given above, it cannot be asserted that one form of bullying has greater negative consequences then the other one. The extent of impact is governed by the interplay of a number of factors such as the platform employed to bully, the length of exposure to the bullying, the intensity and frequency of bullying, amount of senses involved and the protective shields at hand. The most lethal elements of cyberbullying are the anonymity and absence of a safe haven while for traditional bullying; it is the direct exposure to abuse. Traditional bullying is right into the face of the victim.

To conclude, it cannot be stressed enough that regardless of what form of bully is more harmful; being bullied is harmful and disastrous implications for the mental health of the victims. Bullying feels bad, and it needs to curbed and taken seriously.