代写论文：金融
2015年6月，公司净债务与股权价值万美元估计约为84m.在银行的现金为29.5美元截至6月30日。该公司的负债包括贸易相比，收入在去年75.7美元的债务，M公司是0.5倍的EBITDA（公司的利息收入，税收，depreciationand摊销前）。从那以后，对库存的价值不断贬值。他们削减存货水平显然是为了平衡债务。在这种情况下，NAB银行和汇丰银行银行成为这家银行的主要放贷人。这些银行已提供135m债务重新包装和重组成本的公司。在这，NAB提供债务随着新西兰银行和汇丰银行已经有6000万美元的公司透支。在此之前，行动的银行是导致经营者迪克·史密斯。它只在该操作之后向银行处理事务性服务。由于公司重组（低，2016），NAB和汇丰银行实际上面临这个问题的冲击。在这种情况下，该公司无法满足财务预期，由于公司库存水平上升，公司债务不断增加。
代写论文：金融
In June 2015, the company has a net debt of $41m and the equity value was estimated to be around $84m. Cash in the bank was $29.5 as of June 30. The liabilities of the company excluding trade when compared to the earning posted in the last year were $75.7 m. The debt of the company was 0.5 times EBITDA (A company’s Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciationand Amortization). From then, on the value of the inventory has been steadily devaluated. They cut the inventory levels in an obvious attempt to balance the debt. In this situation, the NAB and HSBC banks became the primary lenders to this bank. These banks had provided the company with 135m debt repackaging and restructuring costs. In this, NAB provided debt along with Bank of New Zealand and HSBC bank had provided with $60m overdraft for the company. Prior to this, action Westpac bank was the lead operator to Dick Smith. It only handled transactional services to the bank subsequent to this action. NAB and HSBC actually faced the brunt of the issue owing to the restructuring of the company (Low, 2016). In this case, the company was not able to meet the financial expectations and there was rising debt owing to the inventory levels of the company.
