代写论文：印度国际贸易
因此，上述分析表明，印度从2015年9月开始至2018年3月31日每年为期200天的从价征收是一项保护主义战略，旨在惠及国内企业。这导致日本的贸易条件下降，因为日本与印度的贸易围绕钢铁进行。因此，从日本进口的产品在2016年有所下降。日本对印度采取的上述措施表示质疑，称印度通知未能准确指出实施此类关税的理由。虽然这不是最合适的经济行动，但它是一种流行和易于实施的方法。印度努力鼓励国内生产者是可以理解的，但这样的措施往往会阻碍他们。大多数国际贸易协议禁止采取此类措施，因为这些措施对于因强制实施而产品成本较高的外国合作伙伴不利。作为世界贸易组织成员的印度在国际贸易方面有义务保持一定程度的公开性。印度已经实施该战略。尽管争端的结果到目前为止还没有解决，而且无论磋商结果如何，印度都把她与日本的关系置于危险之中。
代写论文：印度国际贸易
Thus, the above analysis suggests that India’s move to impose an ad valorem for a period of 200 days every year beginning in September 2015 till March 31, 2018 was a protectionist strategy to benefit the domestic firms. This led to decreased terms of trade for Japan whose trade with India revolves around iron & steel. As a result, it imports from Japan declined in 2016. Japan disputed the above measure adopted by India citing that the Indian notification fails to point out accurately the reason for imposing such tariffs. While this is not the most appropriate economic action, it is a popular and easy to implement approach. It is understandable that India strives to encourage the domestic producers but such measures tend more to handicap them. Most international trade agreements prohibit such measures as they are disadvantageous for the foreign partner whose products become costlier due to the imposition. India as a member of World Trade Organization is obliged to maintain a certain level of openness when it comes to international trade. India has gone ahead with the strategy. While the result of the dispute is not resolved as of now, and whatever is the result of the consultation, India has put her relation within Japan at stake.
