代写论文：城市规划
在另一项对紧凑型城市奥斯陆的研究中，人们注意到，如果不持续改进，修正，改善土地使用特征，所有城市交通供给的努力都只是供不应求。也许，这是不正确的，不正确的执行。由于奥斯陆人口稠密的地区被认为是汽车依赖度较低，休闲时间较长，郊区交通和人员流动性最高（Holden and Norland，2005）。这使假设在人口稠密的城市中接近日常服务会减少旅行时间的真实性无效。事实上，这些问题是由于缺乏规划预见和不平衡的增长模式。在人口密集的城市里，批评一直完全不同意这种旅行时间较短的观点（Williams，2016）。
代写论文：城市规划
奥斯陆表明，可持续的城市交通可能不是流动性一致性问题的明确答案。当城市发展中的分散集中主宰了规划者的良知时，他们的眼睛就会退出已经存在的和即将出现的城市交通问题及其不稳定的性质。如果城市交通不是理想的，可持续的，而且长期以来必须保持可持续性，那么就不存在实现其目标的问题。城市交通总是内在地体现在土地使用计划，城市规划，交通规划和城市增长计划中。因此，当城市规划人员违背交通逻辑并对城市规划进行修改而导致城市交通的随意规划时，城市交通永远都是不可持续和不合理的。
代写论文：城市规划
In another study of a compact city, Oslo, it was noticed that without continuous refinement, correction, improvement of land use characteristics, all efforts of urban transport provision have been just undersupplied. Perhaps, it has been improperly and unevenly executed. Since densely populated areas in Oslo were assumed to be less automobile dependent and represented higher level of leisure time, the suburban areas showed the highest amount of transport and mobility (Holden and Norland, 2005). This nullifies the authenticity of the assumption that proximity to everyday services in a densely populated city would reduce travel time. In fact, such issues arise of the lack of planning foresight and uneven growth patterns. Critiques have always been in complete disagreement of this notion of less travel time in densely populated cities (Williams, 2016).
代写论文：城市规划
Oslo showed that sustainable urban transport is perhaps not the definite answer to the consistent problem of mobility. When decentralized concentration in urban development dominates the conscience of planners, the eye withdraws from the perceived and forthcoming problems of urban transport and its unstable nature. When urban transport is not, in ideal terms, sustainable, which must remain substantial for a long period, there be no question of fulfilling its objective. Urban transport is always inherently embodied in the land use plan, city planning, mobility planning, and in the city growth plans. Hence, when city planners defy the mobility logic and make amendments to city plans that results in haphazard planning of mobility, urban transport shall always remain unsustainable and unjustified.
