代写论文:内幕交易

代写论文:内幕交易

公众对内幕交易规则的看法,正如人们和公司所观察到的一样,都表明有必要改进。市场从业人员指南的研究表明,对内幕交易法有负面的看法。人们要么认为它不够充分,要么没有得到充分的执行。这位投资总监表示,业内仍在跟踪可疑的交易行为,这些可疑的交易行为正变得非常普遍。在过去十年里进行的ASIC调查显示,只有30%的受访者认为内幕交易的不诚实行为正在被发现和惩罚(Flitcroft & Mason, 2016)。

代写论文:内幕交易
第二,关于柯蒂斯在他的努力中不是秘密的情况下,有例外。参考文献显示,柯蒂斯先生的行为是公开的,没有柯蒂斯先生的努力来隐藏信息。法官认为,“无论如何,我不知道柯蒂斯先生留下了一条清晰的法医线索,这导致了对他强有力的指控,从而减轻了罪行的严重性。”如果他的行为被认为是公开的,那么他肯定认为他没有做错任何事,我拒绝了。在所有情况下,我认为犯罪的客观严重性很高”(R v Curtis (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 866, 2016, para)。月22日至23日)。他认为,柯蒂斯的过错造成的损害,对公司、公司的客户以及公司的个人交易员都造成了损害。它给公司带来了不必要的压力,并被认为损害了整个市场的诚信和信心。

代写论文:内幕交易

The public views on insider trading regulations as observed form people and companies alike show that there is a need for improvement. Studies from market practitioner’s guide show that there is a negative view of the insider trading laws. People either believe that it is not adequate or is not adequately enforced. The investment director of Capital, suggested that questionable trading practices are still being followed in the industry and that these questionable trading practices are becoming very common. ASIC surveys that were conducted in the last ten years showed that around only 30 percent of the polled population believed that dishonesty in the context of insider trading is being found and punished (Flitcroft & Mason, 2016).

代写论文:内幕交易
Secondly, exception was claimed on the context that Mr. Curtis was not being clandestine in his efforts. References were brought in that showed the actions of Mr. Curtis as being open for interpretation with no effort from Mr. Curtis end to hide information. The Judge held that “In any event, I do not see how the fact that Mr. Curtis left a clear forensic trail which resulted in there being a strong case against him mitigates the seriousness of the offence. If the suggestion is that the alleged openness of his conduct reveals he must have believed he was not doing anything wrong, I reject it. In all the circumstances, in my view the objective seriousness of the offence is high” (R v Curtis (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 866, 2016, para. 22-23). he Judge held that the damage resulting from offenses of Mr. Curtis, was damaging to the company, the clients of the company and the individual traders of the company as well. It put unnecessary pressure on the company and was seen to be damaging the integrity and confidence in the general market as well.