加拿大代写：税收对加拿大的影响
这篇读者回应的文章题为“当选总统的税收威胁加拿大的竞争力”，加拿大正在审查唐纳德·特朗普在美国提出的减税计划的影响。它肯定会产生一些影响，但必须确定正确的影响因素，特别是竞争力的因素，以避免作出错误的、毁灭性的决定。
这一反应将为加拿大提供适当的选择，以便在可能出现商业衰退时进行调整，并为新的政策倡议和季节做好准备，以适应一些艰难但积极的决定。
加拿大代写：税收对加拿大的影响
加拿大是一个对商业极其友好的国家，必须继续保持15%的联邦税率，特朗普计划将目前35%的税率降至15%。加拿大担心自己的业务会从自己的海岸流失到下面的美国，因为预计美国将把企业税率降至15%，这对企业来说是一个非常有吸引力的场景，即使它们不需要缴纳加拿大正在考虑征收的碳税。减税的含义是获得更高的政府收入，如果美国政府无法获得预期的收入，他们将修改决定。加拿大对企业征收碳税的计划可能会受到打击，这是一个简单的观察，但可能会有不同的排列，因为美国也将征收某种环境税，以加快其收入。加拿大不必对其征收碳税的政策持批评态度，而必须继续这样做，因为这是为了环境，不应受制于美国的税率。此外，将一项完整运作的业务从一个国家转移到另一个国家并不是一项简单的任务，包括批准退出和在加拿大留下现成的市场份额。由于美国国会将在将税率降至15%的显著低点之前进行多次核查，人们对企业转移的预期不会很快产生效果。业务的转移可以通过与现有经营业务相匹配或提供其他税收优惠来处理。
加拿大有大量的双重征税，一种是对所有公司征收的联邦税率，另一种是对在这些省经营的公司征收的省级税率。最低为4%，最高为16%，企业很难证明其经营和预期利润是合理的。如果加拿大考虑建立一个统一的税收制度，将单一的税法适用于所有的公司，这将对公司具有吸引力。这将增加省级地区的商业投资，目前由于税收增加，这些地区缺乏持续增长。没有必要将加拿大的联邦税率降低到10%的低水平，取而代之的是引入新的政策，在持续的制造业投资、创造就业机会等情况下提供免税。加拿大能做的最好的举动是减少对美国贸易的过度依赖，就连特朗普也在试图重新谈判北美自由贸易协定。与其他有意将加拿大作为制造业基地的国家合作，将是平衡加拿大贸易依赖的正确步骤，从而使加拿大和加拿大公民比现在更安全。尽管特朗普对北美自由贸易协定不感兴趣，而且重新谈判要求他废除该协定，但许多经济学家对其完全不以为然，因为美国拥有地理上的统一很重要(帕内塔，2016)。特朗普10%的遣返税率是为了吸引数万亿美元的资金，这些资金被藏匿在担心高税收的国际市场上，而高税收是为了增加税收收入。因此，它对加拿大不是一个大的威胁。
加拿大是美国最可靠的石油供应国之一，考虑到加拿大不能将特朗普的政策意图解读为威胁(“这是特朗普总统将如何影响加拿大”，2016)。事实上，当不相关和过时的条款被废除后，它甚至可能变得更加强大。即使在经合组织国家中排名第三，美国排名第12位，它也不会剥夺加拿大的商业友好环境，在那里，通过一些税收调整，它可以很容易地消除企业的外部威胁。
加拿大代写：税收对加拿大的影响
This reader response is presented to the article named “President-elect’s taxes threaten Canadian competitiveness”, Canada is reviewing the impacts of Donald Trump’s proposed tax cuts in the US. It surely will have some impact, but the right factors of influence especially of competitiveness are to be ascertained so as to avoid taking a wrong decision, a devastated one.
This response will give suitable options to Canada to adjust the decline in business, if it may arise, and to gear up for a new policy initiative and season to accommodate some tough but positive decisions.
加拿大代写：税收对加拿大的影响
Canada is an extremely business friendly country and must remain, with its dynamic federal tax rates of 15%, to which Trump is planning to come down to from its present tax rate of 35%. Canada fears losing its business from its own shore to the US below, as the US is expected to cut corporate tax rates to 15%, a very attractive scenario for businesses, even when they are not required to pay the carbon tax, which Canada is thinking to impose. There are implications of tax deductions and that is to gain higher government revenues, and if the US government is not able to gain its expected revenue, they will amend their decision. Canada’s plan of imposing carbon tax on businesses may be hit, a succinct observation, but there may be different permutations, as US will also impose some kind of environment tax to expedite its revenues. Canada need not be critical of its policy of imposing carbon tax, and must go ahead with it, as it is for the environment and must not be subject to the US tax rates. Besides, moving an entire functioning business from one country to another is not a simple task, involving exit approvals and leaving a ready market share in Canada. The anticipation seen in shifting businesses will not fructify soon, as the US congress will put multiple checks before cutting taxes to a significant low of 15%. The shifting of business can be handled with matching or offering may other tax advantages to currently operating businesses.
Canada has high amounts of double taxation, one is the federal tax rates common for all corporate and other is the provincial taxes applied to corporations operating in these provinces. With the lowest rate at 4% and the highest at 16%, it is difficult for corporations to justify their operations and anticipated profits. If Canada mulls a uniform tax system where a single tax code is applied to all corporations, it would be attractive for corporation. This will shoot up business investments in provincial regions, currently lacking consistent growth due to higher taxes. There is no need to reduce Canada’s federal tax rates to a low of 10%, but instead introduce new policies of offering tax exemptions under consistent manufacturing investments, job creations, etc. The best move Canada can make is to lessen, and it is over dependence on US trade, where even Trump is trying to renegotiate the NAFTA agreement. Tying up with other nations interested to make Canada their manufacturing home will be the right step in balancing its trade dependence so as to keep it and the citizens safer than they now are. Despite Trump’s disinterest in NAFTA and renegotiation request his scrapping, it completely is being played down by many economists, as it is important for the US to have geographical unity (Panetta, 2016). Trump’s repatriation tax rates of 10% is to lure back trillions of money stashed in international markets fearing higher taxes, which is to build tax revenues. Hence, it is not a big threat to Canada.
Canada is one of the most reliable oil suppliers to the US, considering this Canada cannot interpret Trump’s policy intents to be threatening (“Here is how the Trump presidency will impact Canada”, 2016). In fact, it may even be stronger after the negotiations when irrelevant and outdated clauses are done away with. Even with the 3rd ranking in OECD countries and US coming to the 12th position, it will not deprive Canada of its business friendly environment, where with some tax adjustments, and it can easily do away with the outgoing threat of businesses.
