本文主要講的是立法原則，全文共分四章。前兩、三章分別是英國立法原則、德國立法原則和中國法律原則。另一個重要的章節是運用二次元法進行比較批判，並對中國法律視角提出建議。綜上所述，根據現有的研究和判例法，在廣告作為邀請的情況下，沒有實際的報價。另一方面，在作為要約邀請的廣告中，一個明確的要約被提出。本篇論文代寫行情文章由美國論文通AssignmentPass輔導網整理，供大家參考閱讀。
There are four critical chapters include in this thesis. The first two three chapters are the doctrines of United Kingdom legislation, German legislation and Chinese law. The other significant chapter is one where a comparative critique using secondary spruces is conducted and recommendations made for the Chinese law perspective. In conclusion it has been stated with existing research studies and case law that in the case of advertisements as invitations to treat, no actual offer is being made. On the other hand in the case of advertisements as invitations of an offer, an explicit offer is made.
The reward as an invitation to treat versus the reward as an offer has been discussed. From the UK contract law perspective, because of the nature of offer-acceptance, the nature of explicit offer, and the concept of consideration, the reward advertisement is handled under the unilateral contract doctrine. The German law position on the advertisement for reward is that if a person, who by public notice announces a reward for the performance of an act or production of a result, the reward offeror is then bound to pay the reward to any person who has performed the act, even if the person did not act with the reward in mind or did not know about the reward earlier. “The advertisement of the reward is not regarded as an offer to make a contract but as what DCFR terms a ‘unilateral juridical act’ (the German term is einseitiges Rechtsgeschaft).
In the case of rewards, the reward may be withdrawn at any time before the act has been performed; see SS 657-61 BGB. This ‘non-contractual’ analysis means that the reward may be claimed by someone who was unaware of it at the time they did the stipulated act: 657 BGB which is not the case in English Law” Similarly the German law differs from the Chinese law as the Chinese law may accept the ‘unilateral promise arguments’ or the ‘reward as contract arguments’ based on the manifestation of intent of offeror. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the reward as a unilateral promise according to the German legislations. A comparative angle is drawn with the English law.
以上是美國論文通AssignmentPass輔導網提供，我們是專業進行代寫的網站。如果你覺得本文還不夠詳盡，可以再看看本站其它相關文章，或許對你有用。另外，如果需要美國論文代寫，就點擊上方欄目列表，各種服務等著你，客服24小時在線，歡迎諮詢!
