Globally and even across Australian states itself the Melbourne architects work in all its colors and inventiveness of formal attributes along with lyricism narratives, references explicitly and complexity of apparent nature is seen as a well manner sensibility affront. Furthermore, the architecture is mocked as a provincial enhanced compensation for the distant tyrannies or even fear just as the dangerous mutation in a forgotten chemistry lab. It becomes clear however that the architectural culture of Melbourne is divisive. The divisiveness can further be articulated through the works of architect couple. Corrigan and Edmond than any other architects, not even the work of Griffins. Edmond and Corrigan has a career spanned across 50 years wherein rich new vein of distinct architecture in Australia was carved out by them (Gombrich 2002). From the “squatter romanticism” architecture departed in a strong manner in the self-conception of Australia and also through the predominant concerns of inner urban architects in the mid-century and this turned the attention of suburban landscape popular taste on the city fringes of suburban landscapes. The architects Edmond and Corrigan further can be described as pluralism architects driven through concepts from diversified sources and depicted through structures that confront in an awkward manner but in an appropriate manner and humanist depth.