论文代写：金融证券

2000年金融证券市场的行为,说它是一种犯罪行为向公众出售股票的公司在英国,并把它们放在交易市场不参与招股说明书(2000年金融和市场法案,2000)。招股说明书将包含所有的细节关于股票的行为,使持有股票的投资者能够做出适当的评估和采取一个合格的决定向公众出售股份或一个局外人。从招股说明书错报和删除重要信息可能导致刑事调查。该公司作为一个整体负责招股说明书准备,之后董事代表直接责任对于任何错误信息在招股说明书(Mylawyer.co。英国,2014)。尼克在这种情况下没有提供任何招股说明书分享买家和没有包括与苏格兰皇家银行在抵押财产,这可能对电荷被创建通知其他股东在公司的财产。

上市程序需求替代了招股说明书需求自2005年以来,自79年上市程序根据部分2000年金融和市场行为,只有在发行股票的情况下需要专家投资者(哈德逊,2008)。清单事项必须整个招股说明书提出批准英国上市管理局,将自己的决定。

大卫和乔治会发出呼吁寻求调查涉嫌违规的公司通过出售股票在公司没有试图现有股东,以及创建一个对公司没有自己的知识产权。他们还必须寻求调查涉嫌利用筹集的资金从公司的财产抵押贷款在苏格兰和用它来购买另一个属性。

尼克必须继续披露所有违规行为被他试图拯救自己。此外,他必须寻求调查所谓的将他驱逐出投票权,寻求有效的大卫和乔治的行为背后的原因。

论文代写：金融证券

of the Financial Securities and Markets Act 2000, it is mentioned that it is an offence to sell shares of a company to the public in the UK and to put them into trading markets without the involvement of a prospectus (Financial and Markets Act 2000, 2014). The prospectus would contain all the details about the shares in terms of the Act, to enable investors holding the shares to make proper assessment and take a qualified decision about the share sale to the public or to an outsider. Misstatements and removing important information from the prospectus could give rise to criminal investigation. The company as a whole is responsible for the prospectus preparation, after which the directors represent a direct responsibility towards any misinformation presented in the prospectus (Mylawyer.co.uk, 2014). Nick in this case has not provided any prospectus to the share buyers and have not included while mortgaging the property with RBS, which could have informed the other shareholders about the charge being created on the company’s property.
The listing procedures requirements has been replaced by the prospectus requirements since 2005, since listing procedures according to section 79 of the Financial and Markets Act 2000, it is only required in case of offering shares to expert investors (Hudson, 2008). The listing particulars must have the entire prospectus to be put forward for approval to the UK Listing Authority which would then take its own decision.
David and George would have to make an appeal seeking investigations into alleged irregularities in the company by selling shares outside the company without having made an attempt to existing shareholders, along with creating a single charge on the company’s property without their knowledge. They must also seek investigations into alleged use of the money raised from the company’s property mortgage and using it to purchase another property in Scotland.
Nick must go ahead and disclose all irregularities being attempted by him to save himself. Besides, he must seek investigation into the alleged ousting him from voting rights and seek valid reasons behind the actions of David and George.