论文代写：民族主义
中国已成为一个备受争议的话题上升和世界上引人注目的信息素。乐观的看法赞扬中国作为一个新兴大国对现代转换和经济增长,而悲观的观点批评中国是一个危险的状态,可能对世界和平构成威胁。中国民族主义自然也跟着增加经济实力和可疑的声音。这些趋势已经从媒体帮助发展中。学者倾向于相信他们报道的媒体表现出更多的民族主义倾向,当问题涉及到国家利益。以前的文献主要关注中国民族主义与历史和缺乏与媒体的关系。本研究认为,中国国有媒体《环球时报》,显示更大的民族主义倾向在国际问题上比国内问题日报社论。为了分析这个问题,一个内容分析的社论的《环球时报》在2013年首次演出在总(279)。然后,社论在国内和国际问题的编码结果进行比较。本研究的结果支持这一观点,《环球时报》框架“差异性”民族主义的方式,尤其是在国际问题上显示更多的民族主义倾向,与国家利益。
论文代写：民族主义
China rising has become a much-debated topic and remarkable pheromone in the world. The optimistic view praises China as an emerging power for modern transformation and economic growth, while the pessimistic view criticizes China as a dangerous state that potentially poses threats to the world peace. Chinese nationalism naturally has followed the increasing economic power and suspicious voices. These trends have had help developing from the media. Scholars tend to believe that the media show more nationalistic tendencies when they cover issues that involve national interests. Previous literature focuses mainly on the Chinese nationalism in relation to history and lacks to find relations with media. This study argues that the state-owned Chinese media, Global Times, has shown a greater nationalism tendency on international issue than domestic issues in the daily editorials. In order to analyze this issue, a content analysis of all the editorials pieces of The Global Times in 2013 was first performed (279 in total). Then, the coding results of editorials on domestic and international issues were compared. The findings of this study support the idea that the Global Times frames “otherness” in a nationalistic way, especially having shown more nationalism tendencies on international issues that related to national interests.
