在上述计算的基础上，可以指出，苹果公司(Apple inc .)在这一安全性上的预期回报高于使用该基金的19.91%。与此同时，Beta(波动率)是低的，因此可以预期回报可能是积极的，有较低的风险约束。此外，卡特彼勒还创造了14.12%的回报率。然而，在这种安全性下，测试版比苹果公司(Apple Inc .)高出1.56%。同时也分析了市场预期比实际利率更高的预期。此外，在市场信息的基础上，联合爱迪生也被认为是12.36%，但在这种安全的情况下，风险波动率非常低，这对投资者来说可能是积极的。从对北方信托的期望回报率的确定中，计算为10.39%，也低于苹果公司合并爱迪生业务。由于市场回报率预计仅为11%，因此基本上需要在资本投资上获得收益，而不是采用证券(企业金融机构，2017年)。与此同时，由于公司的回报从过去3年减少到2年，在业务的低迷影响了未来投资者的回报时，梅西的业务也很低。
On the basis of the above calculation, it can be stated that the Apple Inc. is indicating the higher expected return over employing the fund in this security which is as 19.91%. With this, the Beta (Volatility measure) is low, so it can be expected that the return might be positive with lower risk constraint. Further, Caterpillar is also generating the return as 14.12%. However, in this security, the Beta is higher than Apple Inc as 1.56%. It is also analyzed that the market expectations is also comparatively expected higher than the actual rate. Moreover, on the basis of market information, Consolidated Edison is also expected as 12.36%, but in this security, the risk volatility is very low that might be positive for investors look into this investment. From the determination of the expected rate of return for Northern Trust, it is calculated as 10.39% which is also lower than Apple and Consolidated Edison business. As the market return is expected only 11%, it is basically required to gain over the capital investing rather than employing the security (Corporate finance institute, 2017). Along with this, return for the Macy’ business is also very low as the return of company is decreasing from last three years and two years before a slack down in business influenced the return for future investors.