论文代写：同行婚姻保护
婚姻可以被认定为一种民事机构，而公民社会对同性伴侣也需要承认。1967年，16个州禁止异族通婚，因为这些州的公民认为这是不道德的。如果同性恋被认为是天生的，比如种族，那么在道德上反对同性婚姻，就等于在道德上反对种族间的婚姻。否认同性恋婚姻的标签最终导致了他们的贬低，这进一步暗示了这对夫妇应该比被社会接受的普通夫妇更少。由同性父母抚养的孩子在合法婚姻(Adut,2012)中没有为普通夫妇抚养的孩子提供适当的证券和保护。然而，没有否认的事实是，同性伴侣也可以有长期的承诺，爱和成功的关系。同性恋和异性恋者寻求婚姻的原因是一样的。他们也有同样的潜力，可以培养良好的、健康的、快乐的孩子。在过去的五十年里，男人的形象变得更加咄咄逼人和笨重。这种男性化的表征描绘了男性与女性相比具有更大的象征力量，而刻板印象通常会让同性恋者变得更强壮、更大。在相应的条件下，男性被认为是一个坚强而又强大的人，被认为是真正的、更有权势的人。经常使用暴力作为一种男子气概的表现，同时觉察到某些职业的过度戏剧化，比如摔跤手(Biblarz和Savci,2010)。
论文代写：同行婚姻保护
Marriage can be identified as a civil institution and recognition is needed for same sex couples from the civil society. In the year 1967, interracial marriages were outlawed by 16 states as it was considered immoral by the citizens of these states. If homosexuality is identified as innate such as race, then morally objecting same sex marriage is the same of morally objecting inter-racial marriages. Denying the tag of marriage for the same-sex relationships ends up devaluing them, which further implies that the couple deserves less than a normal couple accepted by the society. Children raised by same sex parents are not provided with appropriate securities and protections for children raised by normal couples in a legal marriage (Adut, 2012). However, there is no denial in the fact that same sex couples do and can have long term committed, loving and successful relationships. Gays and lesbians have the same reason as that of heterosexual people for seeking marriage. They also have the same potential for raising well- adjusted, healthy and happy children. Since the past fifty years, the images of men have become highly aggressive and bulkier. Such masculine representations depict men to have more symbolic power in comparison with women while stereotypically effeminizing homosexuals along with being physically stronger and larger. In consequential terms, men are to be perceived as tough and big to be identified as real and more powerful men. There is often use of violence as an indication of masculinity while perceiving the excessive dramatization of certain professions such as wrestlers (Biblarz and Savci, 2010).
