分析的结果可以在68个不同的研究中总结。研究发现，2000年以后出现了大约67％的研究结果，其中大部分并不是实际公布的技术报告。其中大约一半的课程实际上为小学生提供了大约46％的服务，而三分之一的人为大约37％的初中学生提供服务。其他人则包括高中生。如果考虑到方法的特点，大约35％的员工为了设计的目的而实际考虑了随机方法，而平均磨损值约为10％，总体可靠性被73％的结果所接受。整个研究中大约有25个没有给出那些在岗的参与者的整体种族。剩余的43个以不同的方式提供信息。在后面的一些研究中，大多数学生主要是青年学生。在大约一半的报告（k = 31或46％）中，不同参与者及其家庭的大部分社会经济地位信息不多。根据其他研究报道的方式，大约有17项研究属于低收入人群，13项研究为那些来自中低收入群体的青年提供服务。
The results of the analysis can be summarized in the 68 different studies. It had been found that around 67 % of the overall studies had been appeared after the year 2000. Also most of these had not been the actual published technical reports. Around half of these programs actually served around 46 % of the elementary students, while around one third of the people actually served around 37 % students from the junior high. Others included high school students. If the methodological features are considered, around 35 % of all the employees actually considered the randomized method for the purpose of design while the value of the mean attrition was around 10 % and the overall reliability had been accepted by 73 % of the outcomes. Around 25 of the overall studies didn’t give the overall ethnicity of the participants who are there at post. The remaining 43 gives the information in a number of different ways. Amidst some of the latter studies, most of the students were predominantly youth students. There isn’t much information on most of the socioeconomic status of the different participants and their families in around half of the reports (k=31 or 46%). On the basis of the manner in which the other studies had been reported, around 17 studies had belonged to the people of low income groups while 13 studies served those youth who were from both low and middle income groups.