论文代写：英国脱欧的影响
第二个概念是继权力之后，可以用来分析英国脱欧对英国和中国的影响，以及它们对国际关系的影响，这是由大国主导的媒体帝国主义。自从英国广播公司和美国有线电视新闻网成立以来，美国和英国一直主宰着国际媒体，世界已经开始将这些媒体频道视为比生活更大的频道(查达和卡沃里，2000)。英国退欧对这些渠道进行了大量讨论，英国和中国的记者将对英国与中国关系的相关影响有一个清晰的认识。考虑到媒体帝国主义，CNN宣称它已经彻底改变了国际关系发生的方式是值得怀疑的;现在，当全球媒体变得司空见惯，每个人都知道重要事件的发生时，就会发现与这个故事无关的事情(Robinson, 2001)。因此，CNN效应，如果坚持它的说法是错误的，并且在媒体出现的早期可能是适用的，但不是现在当媒体是一个专业的机构，它本身是一个好的质量新闻和信息通过的竞争对手比更容易。当每个人都知道英国退欧事件，每个人都对国际关系有更广泛的影响时，媒体的作用就被缩短为一个早期的或一个有特权的观众。
论文代写：英国脱欧的影响
The second concept after power that can be used to analyse the impact of Brexit on UK and China correspondent and their corresponding impact on international relations is that is media imperialism dominated by the larger nations. The US and UK have been dominating international media ever since BBC and CNN have come into existence, the world has set stage to view these media channels as larger than life (Chadha and Kavoori, 2000). Brexit has discussed heavily on these channels and the correspondents in UK and China will have a clear view about the relevant impacts on the relations between UK and China. Considering media imperialism, the claim of CNN effect that it has overhauled the way international relations take place is questionable; for now when global media has become commonplace and everyone knows about important events in and out, there is less relevance about the same story (Robinson, 2001). Hence CNN effect, if sticks to its claims is incorrect and may have been applicable in earlier times when media was emerging, but not now when media is a professional body and is itself a competitor for good quality news and information passage is more simple than easier. When everyone knows about the Brexit event and everyone has a rough idea of broader impacts on international relations, the role of media is shortened to be an early or a privileged spectator.
