论文代写：育儿方式
家庭的影响可以在环境的语境中被理解，作为一个单独的因素，因为它对孩子的影响很大(年轻人等人，2011年)。研究人员对育儿方式和对反社会行为的影响进行了研究，认为这在孩子身上形成了对立的攻击性行为。当孩子的父母不符合他们给孩子的规则和命令时，孩子就会受到行为问题和攻击性的影响。在对立和侵略性行为的背景下，孩子们已经认识到，父母在某种程度上可能会对孩子的行为产生负面的影响。强制性的育儿和敌对的育儿方式是父母可以以消极的方式强化孩子行为的两种方式(格罗贝尔和Hinde，1989;Haemelie et al .,1998)。对孩子的敌意抚养或攻击性的教育，以及对孩子的人身攻击都是不一样的。敌对的育儿方式可以产生因果关系，或者与孩子产生联系。孩子可能是第一个触发敌意养育的孩子。孩子可能会影响父母，而父母也会影响孩子。然而，敌对的育儿方式导致了对立的障碍，孩子们可能会在自己的行为中表现出攻击性，或者在他们不能表现出来的时候，抑制这种负面的攻击(Gudjonsson等人，2011年)。这些类型的侵略行为在父母的缺席下也被观察到(Gudjonsson等人，2011年)。在研究工作中，人们认为父亲的缺席会在孩子身上引发这样的积极倾向。这在一个父亲的例子中是适用的。在反社会的父亲的例子中，孩子和反社会的父亲的孩子越多，孩子就越有攻击性。严厉的家教并不会对孩子造成侵犯。在大多数情况下，缺乏温暖和与孩子的联系被认为是主要的主要因素。孩子的行为问题干预会在父母严厉的时候被破坏(年轻人等人，2009年)。家长们被认为是冷漠的，而不感兴趣的孩子，他们对父母为他们设置的干预措施不感兴趣。浅薄的育儿方式对孩子的正面鼓励较少。
论文代写：育儿方式
The influence of family can be understood in the context of environment and as a separate factor, because of the profound influence, it has on the child (Young et al., 2011). Parenting styles and the influence on antisocial behaviour have been studied by researchers as creating oppositional aggressive behaviour in the child. The child suffers conduct problem and aggression when their parent is not consistent in the rules and commands that they give to the child. In the context of oppositional and aggressive behaviour, understanding in young children has been established that parents could negatively reinforce their child’s behaviour in a way. Coercive parenting and hostile parenting are two ways that the parent could reinforce child behaviour in a negative manner (Groebel & Hinde, 1989; Haemelie et al., 1998). Hostile parenting or aggressive parenting and physical assaults on the child because of aggression are not the same. Hostile parenting can have its roots in cause and effect, or associations with the child. The child could be the one that triggers the hostile parenting in the first place. The child could influence the parent and the parent could influence the child. Hostile parenting style, however, results in oppositional disorders where the children might either act out aggression by themselves or repress such negative aggression when they are not able to act out (Gudjonsson et al., 2011). These forms of aggression are observed in the absence of a parent too (Gudjonsson et al., 2011). In the research work, it was established that the absence of a father would trigger such aggressive tendencies in a child. This is applicable in the case of a prosaically father. In the case of antisocial fathers, it so happened that the more the child spent with the antisocial father, the more the child was aggressive in nature. Harsh parenting alone did not cause aggression in the child. In most cases, the lack of warmth and connection with the child was observed to be main leading factors. Child conduct problems intervention gets damaged when the parenting is harsh (Young et al., 2009). Parents are then perceived as being cold and less emotional by the children who are not interested in parenting interventions that are set up for them. The shallow parenting results in less positive encouragement for the child.
