论文代写：澳洲种族主义
为了在澳大利亚社会中定位权力和影响力，同时在以欧元为中心和男性对历史和定型形象的看法的基础上建立国家认同框架，以及土着人民和多元化的含蓄边缘化和排斥，已作出重大努力社区。特权和权力的维护以及对部分或全部承认的恐惧是造成澳大利亚种族歧视的一个关键因素（Paradies，2015）。因此，种族主义不能被视为一种非理性的现象，而是在全社会反映当代和历史的权力关系。众所周知，政治家和政府鼓励团体之间具有竞争力的理解，特别是在经济安全方面。据称，这是受到赔偿，土地权和对土着居民的赔偿或以更人道的方式对待他们的威胁。种族主义可以被强调为不同群体之间的经典斗争。白人澳大利亚人努力保持权力，原住民的努力抓住了它。
论文代写：澳洲种族主义
在特定的社会环境或政府形式下，两者之间平等分享的权力并不存在（Varganova，2012）。在不可避免的意义上，一个团体或个人将发挥最终的决策权。在整个澳大利亚的自由社会中，少数群体最终成为决策者，因为他们阻止选举，在决策者的最终权力结构中形成联盟，或与其他少数群体合作。在最坏的情况下，反对派最终会最终推翻或弹decision决策者。种族主义可以被认为是故意滥用立法权力和社会客户的行为，防止少数群体被决策者充分参与到多数群体的政治，经济和社会制度中（Nelson，2015）。整体社会和政治气候可以被认为是推动失衡状态下持续的权力的责任。如果最终决策者拒绝给予原住民真正的权力，他们就会冒失去权力的风险。
论文代写：澳洲种族主义
Major efforts have been put in for positioning power and influence in the society of Australia while promoting the frameworks of national identity set on the basis of euro-centric and masculine perceptions of history and stereotypical images with the implicit marginalization and exclusion of indigenous people and diverse communities. The maintenance of privilege and power, and the fear of conceding partially or whole is a crucial factor contributing in racial discrimination in Australia (Paradies, 2015). Therefore, racism cannot be considered as an irrational phenomenon, but instead is reflecting contemporary and historical power relations all across the society. Politicians and government are known for encouraging a competitive understanding among groups, specific with respect to economic security. This is threatened allegedly by compensation, land rights, and reparation to indigenous population or by treating them in a more humane way. Racism can be highlighted as a classic struggle among different groups. White Australians strive upon maintaining power and the aboriginals’ endeavor seizing it.
论文代写：澳洲种族主义
Powers shared equally between the two are not in existence under specific social circumstance or government form (Varganova, 2012). In an inevitable sense, one group or individual will be exerting final authority of decision making. Throughout free societies of Australia, minority groups end up becoming the decision makers finally as they block votes, form alliances in the final power structure of decision maker, or team up with other minority groups. In worst case scenario, groups in opposition end up overthrowing or impeaching decision-makers finally. Racism can be considered as the act of intentionally abusing legislative power and social customer, preventing minorities from the full participation of decision makers in the majority groups’ political, economic and social system (Nelson, 2015). The overall social and political climate can be considered responsible for pushing the continuum of power under disequilibrium. If there is refusal by final decision maker for conceding real power to aboriginals, they altogether risk the loss of power.
