本文主要内容是美国在阿富汗战争中的作用，总统当时没有下达抓捕奥萨马·本·拉登的直接命令。据观察，在2001年以前，阿富汗经历了30年以上的内战。美国只参与了对该国的外围支持。它同情这个国家的稳定，并通过美国的外交项目帮助这个国家。从研究工作中可以了解到，只有当自己国家的安全受到明显威胁时，美国才制定了确定塔利班头目并将其击毙的政策。本篇美国传播学论文代写文章由美国论文通AssignmentPass辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
The President at the time did not give the direct mission order to capture Osama Bin laden. It was observed that before 2001 there were 30 years and more of civil war in Afghanistan. The United States was involved with only a peripheral support for the country. It had sympathy for its stability and aided the country by means of the US diplomatic programs. As understood from the research works, it was only when there was a perceived security threat to its own state that United States worked on a policy of identifying the Taliban head and taking him out.
Prior to 2011, the US supported covert operations. However, it was neither directly involved in the situation of restoring Afghanistan stability or supporting it with any real strategy. In the International relations agenda of the United States, it could be argued that Afghanistan did not play much of a role with respect to its diplomatic, information, military, economic or intelligence relations.
This was to change after the September 11, 2001 incident. After the attack on the United States, the country retaliated. This time the United States had an agenda and a strong interest in Afghanistan. Years of foreign policy attempting to at least maintain diplomatic relations with Afghanistan was to take a beating, as President Bush gathered his forces. This was a time when diplomatic and military plans were drawn up (Samples, 2011). The national security team allied with the Central Intelligence Agency set out a plan for conducting a series of operations for infiltrating Afghanistan and even working with some of the warlords of the state to fight the Al Qaeda (Junta, 2013).
The theory of realism is appropriate to understand why the United States decided to attack Afghanistan when its interests escalated. Realism is an international relations theory. This theory believes that a realist state would be motivated to act internationally to protect its own interests and the national interests, “that statesmen think and act in terms of interest defined as power, and the evidence of history bears that assumption out” (Morgenthau, 1985, p.5). Even if it appears like it was acting for some moral concerns, the truth would be that it was motivated by national interests (Morgenthau, 1952). Realism is more like a foreign policy that has its roots in national interest and is driven by power (Kissinger, 1994). This is a logical understanding that almost all states will seek to ensure that they have political autonomy and they will seek to protect their interests as much as they want to stay powerful. They want to protect their national integrity. When both these interests are protected then the states would seek to secure land, resources, and other economic interests to further their security. Only some states would choose to remain without action in international relations. The United States has shown for a long period that they would seek to protect their interests.
以上是美国论文通AssignmentPass辅导网提供，我们是专业进行代写论文的网站。如果你觉得本文还不够详尽，可以再看看本站其它相关文章，或许对你有用。另外，如果需要美国论文代写价格，就点击上方栏目列表，各种服务等着你，客服24小时在线，欢迎咨询!
