美国代写:合同法案例

美国代写:合同法案例

目前的任务与澳大利亚消费者法有关。给定的案例围绕着时尚设计师Winnie和活动策划人Eva之间的合同展开讨论。根据给定的案例,Winnie不得不计划她的婚礼,为此她与Eva签订了合同。双方于2015年9月13日签订的合同中包含了多项条款,明确了翡翠礁酒店在温妮大事件中的角色和责任。在这份Eva和Winnie的合同中,双方都有一些隐藏的活动,比如Winnie没有解释婚礼上为她的婚纱举办的时装秀是为了盈利,Eva也没有提到乐队暗示是她的儿子。然而,在婚礼当天,温妮一切都不顺利,因为热带飓风来袭,一切都没有按计划进行。温妮觉得她有权就所发生的损失起诉伊娃。在这方面,关于合同成立的相关法律、合同条款的效力、损害合同的因素以及Winnie可获得的损害赔偿和补救办法,已在本次转让中进行了讨论。此外,与违约有关的后果也是本次转让的一部分。

Winnie和Eva签订了一份合同,由Eva负责管理Winnie的婚礼事宜。合同中有六项条款规定了翡翠礁酒店的角色和责任。除此之外,伊娃还口头告诉温妮,在某些情况下,热带风暴会扰乱翡翠礁酒店发生的事件。伊娃还向温妮推荐了一支名为“The Trolls”的乐队。然而,她没有告诉温妮乐队的成员实际上是他的儿子和朋友。此外,温妮点的亚洲手指大餐竟然是来自超市的冷冻食品。在这个案例中,另一个突出的问题是,作为一名时装设计师,温妮计划在她的婚礼上展示她的新系列婚纱。然而,她从来没有向伊娃提起过这件事。合同细节如下。

美国代写:合同法案例

澳大利亚合同法包括在两个或两个以上当事人之间订立的合同。合同是一种承诺,在法律上约束当事人遵守作为合同一部分的条件。在这方面,违反合同很可能按照商定的条款和条件造成若干消极后果。合同法所称合同的成立,是根据当事人对合同条款的约定而成立的。本协议没有关于双方隐藏议程的任何信息。根据澳大利亚合同法,对价是合同成立的另一个基本要素。除此之外,意图、能力和手续是构成合同的重要组成部分。

初步讨论和条款被视为双方的初步协议。正如史密斯诉休斯一案所述,尽管买方和卖方的意图不同,但双方达成的协议导致了合同的形成。法院无视史密斯和休斯的不同主观意图,认为双方存在有效的合同。

美国代写:合同法案例

The current assignment is related to the Australian Consumer Law. The given case discusses around the contract that took place between Winnie, a fashion designer and Eva, an event planner. As per the given case, Winnie had to plan her wedding for which she entered into a contract with Eva. The contract between them concluded on 13th September 2015 and included a number of clauses which clearly defined the roles and responsibilities of Emerald Reef Hotel with respect to the big event of Winnie. In this contract between Eva and Winnie there were some hidden activities from both side like Winnie did not explain about the fashion show for her dress at her wedding to generate profit and Eva did not mention that the band suggested is her son. However, at the day of the wedding, nothing went well for Winnie as a tropical hurricane struck and nothing went the way it was planned. Winnie felt that she had the right to sue Eva for the damages that took place. In this regard, the relevant laws related to the formation of the contract, validity of the contract terms, the factors that vitiated the contract and the damages and remedies that are available to Winnie have been discussed in the current assignment. In addition, the consequences with respect to the breach of contract are also a part of this assignment.

A contract took place between Winnie and Eva according to which Eva was responsible for managing the wedding event of Winnie. Six clauses defining the role and responsibility of the Emerald Reef Hotel where the event was supposed to take place were a part of the contract. In addition to this, Eva also verbally told Winnie that at some occasions, tropical storms result in upsetting the events that take place at the Emerald Reef Hotel. Eva also recommended a band namely ‘The Trolls’ to Winnie. However, she did not tell Winnie that the members of the band were actually his son and his friends. Moreover, the Asian Finger Feast that was ordered by Winnie turned out to be frozen food sourced from a supermarket. Another issue that has been highlighted in the given case is that Winnie being a fashion designer had planned to showcase her new range wedding dresses at her wedding. Nevertheless, she never mentioned this to Eva. The contract details are followed as below.

美国代写:合同法案例

The Australian Contract Law is inclusive of the formation of the contracts that take place between two or more parties1.A contract is a promise that legally binds the parties involved to follow the conditions that are a part of the contract. In this regard, the breach of contracts is likely to result in a number of negative consequences as per the agreed terms and conditions. The formation of contracts as per Contract Law is based on the agreement of the involved parties with respect to the clauses of the agreement. This agreement has no information about the hidden agenda by both the parties. Consideration is another essential element of the contract formation as per the Australian Contract Law. Apart from this, intention, capacity and formalities are important elements that are a part of the formation of contracts.

The primary discussion and clauses are considered as initial agreement between the parties. As held in the case of Smith V Hughes2, an agreement on the part of the both the parties resulted in the formation of a contract despite the differences in the intentions of the buyer and the seller. The different subjective intentions of Smith and Hughes were ignored by the court of law as it was held that a valid contract between both the parties existed.