美国论文代写哪个好：公司实体
在当今世界，有大量的公司。每一个公司也有其运作的各种实体或机构。不同类型的公司可能以不同的类型出现，但一般而言，它们也可以通过管辖法律加以划分，在管辖法律中，它们的图表可能有所不同。在本研究中，将对公司实体进行讨论(Hamilton, 1970)。将对公司实体进行分析。除此之外，还将对与公司实体相关的报表进行解释。进一步的讨论将在公司实体的边界及其局限性，以及可能证明相应的局限性的例子。讨论还包括对“公司实体像回旋镖一样工作，击中了试图使用相同工具的人”这句话的解释。法人的活动范围可以依法予以限制。将讨论这些限制如何对公司实体产生影响。
美国论文代写哪个好：公司实体
公司可以定义为一个公司或一组人，他们可以被授权作为一个单独的实体，也可以保持在一个特定的低水平。因此，公司实体可以被定义为在法律上与其成员不同的东西。具有法人资格，可以持有该财产。它对某人有权利，也可以被任何人起诉(Blumberg, 1990)。公司可以被定义为根据国家法律设立的可以导致开户的法人实体，也可以拥有购买任何一种财产的权利。它还可以签订与业务环境相关的不同契约。与公司实体相关的最重要特征之一是，所有者对公司债务不承担责任。公司是由股东所有，由管理人员和董事管理的东西(Canfield, 1917)。因此，在当今世界的竞争中，公司实体是一个重要的术语。本法认为该单位也与其所有人是分开的。公司实体拥有独立于其所有者的法律权利。可能有不同类型的公司。为了解释公司实体的原则，可以考虑所罗门公司的案例。所罗门的原则规定，公司可以是一个独立的法律实体。因此，这类公司在法律上属于“法理学”人。这个案例非常复杂，有很多层。沙龙实际上是英国的一个皮革商人。他创立的公司要求有大约7个股东，包括他的妻子和孩子。除此之外，他还借了公司的钱，然后又借了更多的钱。这使他陷入经济困境。所罗门被英国上诉法院认为是一个骗子，他的公司是一个“骗局”。不过，另一方面，英国上议院表示，该公司成立得当，没有欺诈行为。还有人说，所罗门先生与他的公司是不同的实体。根据公司法，它允许成立上市公司或私有公司(Sato et al.， 2014)。所罗门事件中存在的原则可以很容易地适用于许多情况，即上议院法官没有预知的情况。根据所罗门的原则，永远都有可能否认死者与公司之间建立的契约关系。如果此阶段已经完成，则没有理由要求包含服务的合同。此外，如果死者实际上是代理人，公司和当事人之间也可以进行谈判。因此，原则是承认公司也可以是一个单一的法律实体，它可以对可能对公司的创立负责的人不利。
美国论文代写哪个好：公司实体
In the present world, there are a large number of corporates. Each and every corporate also has various entities or bodies at which they function. The different kinds of corporations may come up in different types but in general they may also be divided through the law of jurisdiction in which they may be differently charted. In this research, the discussion will be done on the corporate entities (Hamilton, 1970). There will be analysis on the corporate entities. In addition to this, there will be an explanation of the statement related to the corporate entities. Further the discussion will be done on the boundaries of corporate entities and its limitations along with the examples which may prove the corresponding limitation. The discussion also includes the explanation of the statement “Corporate entity works like a boomerang and hits the man who was trying to use the same”. In case of the corporate entity, the scope of the activity may be limited under the law. There will be discussion on how the limitations may act against the corporate entity.
美国论文代写哪个好：公司实体
A corporation may be defined as a company or a group of people who may be authorized to act as a single entity and can also stay under a specific low. A corporate entity therefore may be defined as something that is legally distinct from its members. It has a legal personality and can hold the property. It has the right to someone and it can also be sued by anyone (Blumberg, 1990). The corporation may be defined as the legal entity which has been created under the law of the state which can lead to the opening of an account, can also have the right to purchase any kind of property. It can also enter into different contracts related to the business environment. One of the most important features related to the corporate entity is that the owners of the same are not liable for the purpose of debts of the corporation. The corporations are something thatis owned by the shareholders and run by the officers and the directors (Canfield, 1917).Thence, in the present world of competition, corporate entity is an important term. This law regards that the entity is also separate from its owners. A corporate entity has its own legal rights which can be independent of its owners. There may be different types of corporations. In order to explain the principle of corporate entity, the Salomon’s case can be considered. The Salomon’s principle states that a company may be a separate legal entity. Therefore, this kind of company is a “juristic” person in the eyes of law. This case was very complex and has a number of layers. Salon was actually a leather merchant in England. The company set by him required to have around seven shareholders including his wwife and kids. In addition to this, he lent the money of the company and then borrowed more money. This led him into the financial trouble. Salomon was considered as a fraud and his company was a “sham” by the UK Court of appeal. Though, on the other hand, House of Lords stated that the company had been set up properly and there was no fraud in the company. Also it was stated that Mr. Salomon was a different entity from his company. As per the Corporations Act, it allowed for the formation of the public or proprietary companies (Sato et al., 2014). The principle which is there in Salomon’s case can be easily applied to a number of situations in which there is no anticipation by the House of Lord judges. As per the Salomon’s principle, there may always be the possibility to deny the contractual relationship created between someone who is deceased and the company. In casethis stage is fulfilled, there is no reason why there is requirement to include of the contract for the services. Also, in case the deceased is actually an agent, there can also be a possible negotiation between the company and the person. Thus, the principle was to recognize the fact that the company can be a single legal entity as well and it can work against the person who may be responsible for the creation of the company.
