论文代写：企业社会责任
这四个由Kramar & Porter(2006)提供的企业社会责任的理由在该领域具有最新的智慧，然而，它们都没有为企业领导者必须做出的艰难选择提供足够的指导。每种方法都有实际的局限性。然而，Donaldson & Walsh(2015)和规范性理论提出的fur含义是规范性和经验性的。
论文代写：企业社会责任
Donaldson & Walsh(2015)认为，单个公司的价值创造不能与整个商业世界的价值创造混为一谈。这就是所谓的成分谬误。企业不参与企业社会责任是不正确的。相反，社会创新和社会福利与企业直接相关。如果没有商业组织，就不可能生产出discover药品、CT扫描仪、智能手机、耐旱种子和汽车。所有这些产品都极大地改变了人们的社会生活。随着每个人都开始关注环境和社会的保护，社会对企业的期望也在快速增长。谬论是一种误导人的错误论点。当一个人认为部分或所有部分的特征可以用来表示整体时，就会产生组合谬误。例如，在商业中，人们认为公司的目标是利润最大化或提高客户满意度。在这里，人们不记得公司是大公司积累的一小部分，包括与历史和制度背景有关的商业行为和活动。构成谬论让人们意识到，一个成功组织的素质，不可能与总体上富有成效的企业的素质相同。经营效率对于一个公司和一个企业来说是很重要的;然而，把效率作为公司或企业的最终目标是错误的。这是构成谬误的另一个例子。
论文代写：企业社会责任
These four justifications to CSR provided by Kramar & Porter (2006) have latest intelligent in the field, however, none of them provides adequate guidance for the tough choices have to make the business leaders. Each of the approaches has practical limitations. However, the fur implications proposed by Donaldson & Walsh (2015) and the normative theory is normative and empirical.
论文代写：企业社会责任
According to Donaldson & Walsh (2015), value creation for a single company must not be mixed up with the value creation for the whole business world. This is known as composition fallacy. It is not true that businesses do not participate in CSR. Rather social innovation and social welfare are directly linked with businesses. It would not have been possible to produce discover medicines, CT scanners, smartphones, drought-resistant seeds and automobiles without business organisations. All these products have changed the social life of people drastically. The expectation of the society from business is increasing at a high rate, as everyone has become concerned with the protection of the environment and the society. A fallacy is a type of misleadingly bad argument. Composition fallacy takes place when one assumes that the feature of a part or of all parts can be used to signify the whole. For example, in business, it is considered that the aim of a company is to maximize profit or to increase customer satisfaction. Here, people do not remember that a firm is a small part of the large accumulation of companies that include business deeds and activities related to historical and institutional context. The composition fallacy makes people aware of the possibility that the qualities of a successful organisation cannot be same as the qualities of fruitful business in overall. Operational efficiency is important for a firm and a business; however, considering efficiency as the final goal of a firm or business is a mistake. This is another example of composition fallacy.
