代写论文：剽窃
CAE挑衅倡导剽窃。这部电影是挑衅性的反对,尽管它还考虑其他角度同样。CAE起初剽窃的定义是东西”被视为语言的盗窃,想法,和图像的不到人才,通常个人财富的增强或声誉”(83年“CAE”),然后走到重新定义,指出剽窃确实必要确保文化是分布式的。有作者的作品永远不会理解或使用或重新定义在其他学科如果没有剽窃者。改善”的想法。单词的意义参与改进。剽窃是必要的。进步意味着它”(“CAE”85)。词所使用的类型和意义传达了剽窃的两个极端。一是原型的定义理解剽窃和另一个极端,认为剽窃是文化进步的必要条件。
代写论文：剽窃
CAE is being provocative advocating for plagiarism. The movie is provocative in opposing it, although it also considered the other stand point just as equally. CAE at first defines plagiarism as something that “has been viewed as the theft of language, ideas, and images by the less than talented, often for the enhancement of personal fortune or prestige” (“CAE” 83) and then goes onto redefine it stating that plagiarism is indeed necessary to ensure that culture is distributed. There are works of authors that would never have been understood or used or redefined across other disciplines if not for the plagiarist. “Ideas improve. The meaning of words participates in the improvement. Plagiarism is necessary. Progress implies it “(“CAE” 85). The type of words that are used and the meanings conveyed presents plagiarism from two extremes. One is that of defining the archetypal understanding of plagiarism and the other extreme is that of viewing plagiarism as necessary for cultural progress.
