代写论文：教师差异
这项研究确定了教师的中性言语行为的不同程度的差异，与非战略和战略课程相比，分离三种不同的地理环境。然而，不管地理环境如何，教师都会在策略课中口头上采用更加中立的行为。虽然差异很明显，但统计数据并不如此。该研究还包括机构的地理环境对学生和教师行为的影响。由于学校分为农村/乡村，城镇/郊区和城市内部，不同地区的学生在任务行为上无法观察到显着差异。但是，如果将不同地点分别作为三个不同的研究领域进行研究，则可能会有所不同。据观察，尽管与农村或乡村学校的差别不大，但与城镇或郊区学校相比，内部城市的老师更多地使用社会或行为批评。
代写论文：教师差异
与城市或郊区学校相比，在城市中心城市使用社会或行为批评更多，但与农村或乡村学校的差异并不显着。在内城，教师使用的学术批评与城镇或郊区学校相比微不足道，但与农村或乡村学校相比，差异显着很大，如第158页所述。再次，这部分研究是宁肯表面性质的推断表明，农村或乡村教师的学术反馈比其他两个地理位置的积极性略高，但差异没有统计学意义。大多数情况下，推论是虽然差异很明显，但没有提供统计学意义，它们相当模糊，不足以给文章带来明确的优势。这也限制了其作为研究类似主题的人的未来研究材料的范围。该研究的统计支持不足，给改善的余地更大。
代写论文：教师差异
The study identified certain differences of varying magnitude in the neutral verbal behaviour of the teachers as compared to the non-strategy and strategy lessons on separating the three distinct geographical contexts. However, the teachers applied behaviour that is more neutral verbally in the strategy lessons irrespective of their geographical context. Although the difference was evident, it was not statistically so. The study also included the effect of geographical context of the institutions on the behaviour of the students and teachers. Since the schools grouped into rural/village, town/suburban and inner-city, significant differences could not be observed in the on-task behaviour of the students in different locations. However, this might have differed if the different locations were studied separately as three distinct areas of study. It was observed that the teachers applied social or behavioural criticism more in inner-city as compared to the town or suburban schools though the difference with the rural or village schools was not significant.
代写论文：教师差异
The use of social or behavioural criticism as more in inner city as compared to town or suburban schools, however the difference with rural or village schools was not significant. In inner city, the teachers used academic criticism at insignificant high rate as compared to town or suburban schools but the difference was significantly high as compared to the rural or village schools, as mentioned in page 158. Again, this part of the study was rather superficial in nature as the inference indicated that the rural or village teachers used slightly more positivity in their academic feedback than the other two geographical locations though there was no statistical significance in the difference. Mostly, the inference was that though the difference was evident, there was no statistical significance provided which was rather vague and inadequate to give a definitive advantage to the article. This also limited its scope as being future study material for people researching on a similar topic. Statistical backing of the study was inadequate which gave more room for improvement.
