美国论文抄袭：领导力的有效性
米兰达说话的方式明显地显示出她的领导风格是一种阳刚的风格。一些会议是为了创造一些具体或有用的想法，这些想法将成为即将出版的出版物。为了达到这个目的，她不断地思考新的想法，并以一种需要和非常快的速度讨论问题。建构表明米兰达是一种领导角色，通常有更大的权力来驱动和回答。有些问题她可以完全控制选择特定演讲者的问题这些问题都需要回应。收集一些目标，除了运行会议，领导总是连接在发出命令和评估其他一些表现(人类，2008年)。根据一些天文观察，女性领导人倾向于以一种更婉转的方式发出一些命令和指示。还有哪些副语言特征，如不确定性和停顿被用来软化方向?米兰达在一些指令中使用了男性化的特征，女性化的特征并不多见。在下属的反应和评论中，她非常直接，没有使用任何策略去旅行的反感效果。米兰达总是用一些直接的批评形式来评判她的下属。她总是在春天用嘲弄的手法来贬低花香，而没有任何缓和。这使得一些会议中的所有成员在批评她所有的下属时，通常会感到难为情，因为这些下属都是戏剧方面的不足，而使用讽刺(Sen, 2008)。每个来到工作地点的人，显然在会议现场的人，她都必须思考并表示大多数的建议和想法，这些建议和想法是可以支持的。
美国论文抄袭：领导力的有效性
一些研究认为职场人士在这一差异中被低估了，尤其是女性更注重礼貌。米兰达总是用指路和不赞成的言语行为来拉近与下属的距离，以此来把米兰达塑造成一个骄傲而又阳刚的领导。如今更愿意使用的男性使用的路径显示一些女性做后来领导在工作实践中,下属有些不可能的帮助得到一个发现的未发表的一些手稿通常一些显式形式的评论或抱怨的情况下于米兰达(Iszatt-White和桑德斯,2014)。米兰达杂志和制作团队之间的对话在米兰达主持的会议上进行。Emily是另一个助理，他们都是Miranda的下属。米兰达以下属为中心的交易型指挥表现，并不能创造出《Runway》杂志中助理们总是放弃的那种愉悦的氛围，也无法在这样的工作环境中建立更好的关系。
美国论文抄袭：领导力的有效性
The way of speaking of Miranda shows apparently in her leadership that it is a style of masculine one. Some of the meetings are to create some specific or useful ideas that were going to be built-in upcoming publications. In order, she keeps the think of new ideas and discusses the issues in a needy and very fast rapidity. Constructed shows that Miranda is a type of leading role that usually has more power to drive and answering. Some questions she has the entirety control of selecting of particular speaker’s issues that needs to very much responding to it. Gathering of some objectives that apart from running meetings that leaders always connect in giving of commands and evaluating of some other performances (Human, 2008). According to some astronomical observation that women leaders tend to give some commands and directives in a more circumlocutory way. What are more some of paralinguistic features that as uncertainty and pauses are used to order to soften the directions? Miranda is using masculine features while in giving some directives, and not many womanly features can be noticed significantly. In responses and comments of her subordinate that is very direct that she does not use any strategy to journey the off-putting effects. Miranda always adjudicators and evaluates her subordinates in some of the direct forms of criticizing. Addresses comments and without any alleviation she always uses mockery to put down on floral in spring. It makes all the members in some of the meetings is usually self-conscious for criticizing her all subordinates that are the theatre deficiently that using sarcasm (Sen, 2008). Everyone that come to working place and obviously in present of the meeting that she has to thinks and means most of the giving proposals and ideas that could support.
美国论文抄袭：领导力的有效性
Arguing some researches that professionals in workplaces are downplayed within the difference and give emphasis to politeness specially the women. Miranda always uses directions and disapproving speech acts to some enhances distance that subordinates to portray Miranda as a proud and masculine leader. Nowadays preferring to show some women using that masculine using feminine paths of doing subsequently leadership in workplace practice that subordinates to somewhat impossible that helping to get a finding the unpublished some manuscripts for usually some explicit in forms of commenting that or complaining that about cases of Miranda Priestly (Iszatt-White and Saunders, 2014). The conversation between that Miranda her magazine and some production team that discussion takes place in some of the meetings that chaired by Miranda. Emily is another assistant that they are all subordinates to Miranda. Miranda’s transactional commanding performance that focused on her subordinates cannot create the happy and pleasant-sounding atmosphere in “Runway” magazine that her assistants always give up them and establishing a better relationship always in such workplace environment.
