personal statement 代写 :折磨动物不符合任何伦理立场

personal statement 代写 :折磨动物不符合任何伦理立场

从根本上讲,从伦理的角度来看,为了解决任何合理的伦理问题,都需要观察许多问题。从伦理的观点来看,以科学的名义折磨动物并不证明任何结果是合理的。目的不能证明手段是正当的。动物和人类有不同的功能器官系统。这种制度有一定的相似性,但也存在一定的不可辩驳的差异。动物试验的一些程序涉及侵入性的程序。他们被注射了没有保证的化学物质,他们的反应被记录下来。动物被关在笼子里,他们的生活质量受到这个过程的影响,因为他们被迫屈服于酷刑(Shaw & Barry, 2015)。

personal statement 代写 :折磨动物不符合任何伦理立场

科学提出的证据是,动物实验已经导致了许多深刻的发现,并使他们能够找到许多疾病的治疗方法。他们说这些程序是正当的,而且对人类的好处超过了任何可能的限制。

从伦理的角度来看,为了人类的自我保护而折磨动物不符合任何伦理立场。然而,有观点认为这些药物最终会导致人类的安全。它们将在下一节中进行解释。

personal statement 代写 :折磨动物不符合任何伦理立场

Fundamentally from an ethical standpoint many issues need to be observed in order to address any plausible ethical issues. From an ethical standpoint the torture of animals in the name of science does not justify any results. The end does not justify the means. Animals and humans have different functioning organ systems. There could be certain similarities, however certain irrefutable differences also are found to exist in this system. Some of the procedures for animal testing involve invasive protocols. They are injected with unwarranted chemicals and their reactions are documented. The animals are held in captivity and their quality of life is affected by this process as they are forced to succumb towards torture (Shaw & Barry, 2015).

personal statement 代写 :折磨动物不符合任何伦理立场

The evidence that the scientific proposes is that animal testing has lead to a number of profound discoveries and enabled them to find cure for many ailments. They state that these procedures are warranted and the benefits to humans overweigh any possible limitations.

From an ethical standpoint torturing animals for self-preservation of humans do not meet any ethical standpoints. However there is argument made that these drugs leads to eventual safety of mankind. They are explained in the following section.