代写论文：情绪性伤害
情绪型伤害的发生使同意因素失效，由此产生的性行为可能被称为强奸。情感或痛苦的其他伤害可能与同意的有效性一致。需要区分各种情况，以便破译可被归类为同意而不是有效的内容。在法律方面，对胁迫，强奸和概念的适当理解是重要的。按照法律规定，强奸最好是由肇事者实施武力，并且不受受害人的同意。按照改革者的观点，这些因素排除了应该归类为强奸的不愿性行为的方面（Humphreys＆Brousseau，2010）。有一部分人认为武力没有意义，因为没有提供同意，而另一些人则认为对武力的理解需要扩大，使同意无效的力量应该超越与武力或体力本身行为有关的威胁。但是，最重要的方面是同意，其相关条件以及发生强奸时最重要的决定因素。在苔丝的情况下，如果她证实了她是否同意亚历克并且然后怀孕，那么亚历克不会被称为强奸犯并且随后被谋杀。
代写论文：情绪性伤害
Infliction of emotional type harm invalidates the consent factor and the sexual activity that arises from it may be termed as rape. Other harms that are emotional or painful may be consistent with the validity of consent. It is required to distinguish between the various circumstances in order to decipher what can be categorised as consent and yet not valid. In terms of law, the proper comprehension of coercion, rape and concept is significant. As per law, rape ideally involves force by the perpetrator and lack of consent by the victim. As per the reformers, such elements exclude the aspect of unwilling sexual activity that should be categorised as rape (Humphreys & Brousseau, 2010). There are a segment of people who think force is of no significance since consent was not provided while others think the understanding of force needs to be broadened and the force that invalidates consent should be beyond threats pertaining to physical force or the act of physical force itself. However, the significant most aspect is consent, its related conditions and the significant most determinant if rape has occurred. In the case of Tess, had she validated if she had given consent to Alec and then become pregnant, then Alec would not have been termed as being a rapist and subsequently murdered.
