本文主要讲述苏格拉底，如果苏格拉底没有学会生活的基本本质和国家的最佳本质，柏拉图和亚里士多德就不会发展成为意识形态的思想。苏格拉底的一个简单的想法或一个小小的观点，就把它变成了任何个人和国家都能共同繁荣的最好的知识。不可否认，这些事件提供了被认为是罕见的知识，在任何意义上都是智慧的，并且是在没有神性知觉的情况下产生的。因此，研究方法本质上是机械性的。这是因为伟大的哲学家苏格拉底和阿基米德的简单的神性知觉，给了我们著名而令人信服的意识形态，即使到今天，这些意识形态仍然证明了它们在执行中的合法性和实用性。正如笛卡尔(Smith, 2013)在《知识的起源》一书中所述:“我确信，除了我内在的思想之外，我对外界的事物一无所知。”本篇代写论文文章由美国论文通AssignmentPass辅导网整理，供大家参考阅读。
If it was not for Socrates to have learned the basic nature of life and the best nature of a state, Plato, and then Aristotle, would never have developed their ideas that became ideologies. A simple thought or a small perception of idea in Socrates turned it into the best knowledge that any individual and state can ever have to prosper collectively. These events can never be denied their due credit in providing knowledge which is considered rare, intellectual in its every sense, and to have emerged without divinatory perception. Hence, research methods are mechanical in their very nature. This is because simple divinatory perception in great philosophers, Socrates and Archimedes, gave us renowned yet compelling ideologies that, even to this day prove their legitimacy and practicality in execution. As Descartes (Smith, 2013) stated about the origin of knowledge,“I am certain that I can have no knowledge of what is outside me except by means of the ideas I have within me”.
Appelbaum is absolutely correct in calling research methods as giving in to mechanical replacement for divinatory perception. Any knowledge that originates is first and foremost perceived, without which it can never grow as desired and as directed by the mind. Perception is the first stage of learning, and it must be given the credit that is due. Visual images and perceptions when analysed concludes that images makes an impact and forces the viewer to direct his thought. More so, the direction in which a thought is directed is merely relied on the powerful factor of influence, either social, political, epistemological, personal experience, or borrowed opinion. In abstract terms, research methods have to go back to the origin of knowledge and this origin is causeless to be perceived or conceived. This makes the methods irrelevant in their reliance and validity.
In addition, qualitative social science research cannot be relied upon as it gives divisive conclusions, rather indefinite ones. Researching and banking on previous ill-equipped assumptions is mere ignorance of the researcher and of the method itself. Researches are carried out for enhancing a motive pre-planned, making it one-sided and restrictive of the broadness of knowledge that can come with divinatory perception. When researches are aligned to one way of thinking, divinatory perception stays away, making them mechanical in nature. Archimedes and Socrates are great examples of how simple divinatory perceptions manifests itself to the world and a mechanical method of research is rejected, which is nothing but its mere replacement.
以上是美国论文通AssignmentPass辅导网提供，我们是专业进行代写的网站。如果你觉得本文还不够详尽，可以再看看本站其它相关文章，或许对你有用。另外，如果需要美国代写论文价格，就点击上方栏目列表，各种服务等着你，客服24小时在线，欢迎咨询!
