论文代写：海洋权争议
这一议程被宣布为雄心勃勃的计划。该议程还需要一个关于外交敏感性的断言(2012年)。然而，这一争端也表明，一股新的力量正在崛起，这是权力平衡的转变的结果。在全球关系中，许多不同的理论都为美国在钓鱼岛或钓鱼岛的主权问题上的竞争提供了几个貌似合理的解释。关于领土的争议被称作是不同国家之间的一场冲突，两种或更多的冲突，是关于控制和拥有一个小区域的控制权(1960年美国和日本之间的相互合作和安全条约)。关于与全球关系相关的研究，我们知道这些冲突涉及到与岛屿边界有关的争议，以及海洋的不同特征，比如在涨潮时的珊瑚礁。与此形成鲜明对比的是，关于海洋主权的争议被认为是为了获得对水体的排他性权利而产生的冲突，特别是在专属经济区(ee经济区)(2010年)的地区。这是由联合国海洋法公约所解释的，联合国海洋法公约是公约的规定。然而，除了该区域内的水域以外，各国在考虑管辖权的问题上，并没有享受到海洋主权的完整权利，因为它们必须把重点放在允许来自全球国家的船只免受运输和通行(2009年)的影响。因此，可以指出，与领土主权相比，海洋的主权是较弱的。其结果是，与领土争端相比，海上冲突更少考虑到波动，特别是中国、日本和美国之间的合作，阻碍或阻碍合作的可能性更小。
论文代写：海洋权争议
This agenda was declared as an ambitious one. The agenda also needed an assertion over the diplomatic sensitivity (Cheong 2012). This dispute however also illustrated that a new power is rising and this has been the result of shifting the powerful balance. A number of varying theories in consideration with the global relations have contributed in offering several plausible explanations on competition for the interference of the United States within the islands of Senkakus or Diaoyu. A dispute over territory has been referred as a conflict amongst different states, two or more, over the authority of control and ownership of just a small area (Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security between the United States and Japan 1960). With respect to the study related to global relations, these conflicts are known to involve the disputes related to the borders of land along with the islands as well as different features of maritime, like the coral reefs that have been lying above the line of high tide. In contrast to this, a dispute over maritime sovereignty is considered to be the conflict that arises for obtaining the exclusive rights over the water bodies, particularly in case of the region that comes under the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) (Tir 2010). This has been explained by the Convention of the United Nations related to the law of the sea that is UNCLOS. Other than the waters at internal region, however, states have not been enjoying full rights of sovereignty within the areas of maritime in consideration with the jurisdiction, as they must focus on permitting the vessels from the global nations being free of transit as well as passage (Chaoping 2009). Thus, it can be stated that the sovereignty of maritime is weak in comparison with the sovereignty of territory. As a consequence, the conflicts of maritime are less in consideration with volatility than the disputes of territory along with, particularly, less chances of blocking or preventing the cooperation between China, Japan and the United States.
