论文代写：风险管理
在Essendon这个案例中，政府认为年龄在15至24岁之间的员工被认为是主要面临风险的人口。法规规定公司需要遵守风险管理方法。公司必须合法地了解工作危害，评估工作环境中可能发生的风险，消除或控制风险，并找出制定控制措施的方法（康明斯，2012年）。除了这些年轻员工的因素外，容易被吓倒。由于这一点，他们是弱势群体。在这种情况下，埃森登足球俱乐部拥有强大的品牌形象，并且他们总是使用这个来沉默雇员。
论文代写：风险管理
这可能不是直接的恐吓策略，而是员工害怕表达自己想法的策略。这造成了一个不安全和敌对的工作环境。发现34名雇员被指控使用兴奋剂。这表明球员被吓倒了。他们不明白这种药的影响。公司有义务确保员工的安全，并确保他们知道副作用。药物不会导致玩家死亡。尽管如此，该公司因其侵犯隐私并利用年轻玩家的脆弱性而被罚款。由于这一点，该公司被罚款。
论文代写：风险管理
In this case of Essendon, the government concluded that the employees who were aged between 15 to 24 are considered to be the demography that is mostly at risk. The regulations mandate that the company needs to adhere to the risk management approach. Company legally is required to understand the hazards of the jobs, assess the plausible risks that would take place in the workplace environment, elimination or controlling of the risks and findings ways to developing control measures (Cummins, 2012). Apart from these factors young employees, can be intimidated easily. Owing to this they are vulnerable population. In this case, Essendon Football club had a strong brand image, and they had invariably used this in order to silence the employees.
论文代写：风险管理
It might not have been a direct intimidation strategy it was a strategy where the employee was afraid to speak their mind. This had caused an unsafe and hostile work environment. 34 employees were found to be accused of doping. This shows that the players were intimidated. They did not understand the repercussions of the medicine. The company was duty bound to ensure the safety of the employees and to ensure that they were aware of the side effects. The medicines did not cause any mortality in the players. Nevertheless, the company was fined owing to the fact that they violated the privacy and exploited the vulnerability of the young players. Owing to this, the company was fined.
