论文代写：撤销报价
撤销，拒绝，时间到期等是报价可以终止的一些方式。现在撤销规则的一般规定，只要没有被接受，报价可以随时终止。要约人可以通过撤销来终止，即使他们承诺在这段时间内保持开放。撤销必须直接或间接传达，对此如何进行准确传达有一定的理解（Carter等，1996）。在这种情况下，有传言说Mojo提供的报价实际上是错误的，价格实际上远低于承诺的价格。其实质是他们犯了一个错误，Ben听到了这个消息，但是这个消息被某人传达给了他作为谣言。现在据Dickinson诉Dodds（1876）第二被告463上诉法院的裁决，撤销通知可以由第三方进行（Moles＆Sangha，2006）。然而，这里的沟通不是撤销而是谣言。如果有很多人打算通过捕捉鳟鱼来达成协议，可以说实际的直接沟通是不可能的。如果Ben听说Mojo饮料公司撤销了这个提议，因为他们犯了一个错误，那么它可以被视为撤销交流。然而，从本末日起，他所听到的只是一个他可以选择不相信的谣言。
论文代写：撤销报价
在英国上诉法院Dickinson诉Dckds（1876）2Ch被告463的情况下，原告不仅听说了向其他人提出的要约，而且也相信这一要约，因此可以接受撤销。然而，在这种情况下，有一个传闻。仅仅是谣言还不足以表明撤销。 “但是，如果受要约人仅仅听到要约人已经或将要采取与要约不一致的谣言，并且他合理地不相信谣言，即使谣传结果是真实的，也不会被撤销。”（Emmanuel，2006，p 54）。 Offeree Ben听到了谣言和他继续钓鳟鱼的行为，表示他不相信撤销，因此他有权要求获得奖金，或者以某种形式的违约赔偿。
论文代写：撤销报价
Revocation, rejection, time expiry, etc. are some of the ways that the offer could be terminated. Now revocation rules in general state that the offer could be terminated at any time as long as there is no acceptance. The offeror could terminate by revocation even if they promised to keep it open for such amount of time. A revocation has to be communicated either directly or indirectly and there are certain understanding here on how it has to be communicated exactly (Carter et al., 1996). In this case, a rumour had spread that the offer made by Mojo was actually wrong and the price amount was actually much less than what was promised. The essence of it was that they made an error, Ben heard this message, but this was communicated to him as a rumour by someone. Now according to Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch defendant463 Court of Appeal UK, communication of revocation can be done by a third party (Moles & Sangha, 2006). However, here the communication is not of revocation but of a rumour. In the case of a very large group of people intending to compete to enter into agreement by catching a trout, it could be said that actual direct communication could be impossible. If Ben had heard about Mojo Beverages revoking this offer because they made an error, then it could be considered as communication of revocation. However, from Ben’s end, all he heard was a rumour which he could choose not to believe.
论文代写：撤销报价
In the context of Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch defendant463 Court of Appeal UK, the plaintiff had not only heard about an offer being made out to someone else but believe it as well, and hence was acceptable revocation. However, in this case, there is a rumour. Mere rumour is not sufficient enough to show revocation. “But if the offeree merely hears rumours that the offeror has or will take action inconsistent with the offer, and he reasonably disbelieves the rumour, there is no revocation, even if the rumour turns out to have been true” (Emmanuel, 2006, p. 54). Offeree Ben has heard the rumour and his actions of continuing to fish for the trout shows that he did not believe the revocation and therefore he has the right to demand for the prize money, or some form of compensation for breach of contract.
