美国拉雷多论文代写：欧盟对关税的主张
由于泰国是向欧共体出口金枪鱼罐头产品的一个主要国家，而欧共体在泰国金枪鱼出口中占有相当大的份额，对金枪鱼产品征收优惠关税将损害泰国的经济利益。此外，菲律宾同泰国一起寻求同欧共体谈判，因为它是一个金枪鱼出口商，并有其他利益将通过与欧共体的对话预先解决。
美国拉雷多论文代写：欧盟对关税的主张
泰国认为，对其出口到欧盟的金枪鱼罐头征收24%的特惠关税是没有必要的，也是不民主的，至少在世贸组织指导方针下的公平贸易意义上是如此。它主张取消关税，因为从ACP国家出口的相同产品享有零关税，因此似乎具有不公平的竞争。泰国要求欧共体取消关税，因为对从两个不同国家出口的单一产品征收关税具有歧视性。泰国的金枪鱼产品质量从未受到损害，这表现在对欧共体的金枪鱼出口增加。
美国拉雷多论文代写：欧盟对关税的主张
Since Thailand was a major exporter of canned tuna products to the EC and EC represented a significant share of Thailand’s tuna exports, a preferential tariff imposition on tuna products would hurt Thailand’s economic interests. In addition, Philippines joined Thailand in seeking a negotiation with EC, since it was a tuna exporter and had other interests that would be pre-resolved through this dialogue with the EC.
美国拉雷多论文代写：欧盟对关税的主张
Thailand argued that imposing a 24% preferential tariff on its canned tuna exports to the EC was uncalled for and undemocratic, at least in the sense of fair trade under WTO guidelines. It argued the removal of the tariff imposed since the same products exported from ACP countries enjoyed zero tariff and therefore seemed unfairly competitive. Thailand sought the EC to remove the tariff because it was discriminatory to impose tariff on a single product being exported from two different nations. Thailand’s quality of tuna products was never compromised, which manifested in the increasing tuna exports to the EC.
