本篇文章講述的是檢驗問責制和透明度，然而，若干司法管轄區在使用公私合營企業和私人融資方面的政策問題，必須認識到檢驗問責制和透明度的重大要求。這對提案的成功和滿意是至關重要的。在澳大利亞，在聯邦政府一級，重申聯邦利用私人融資的原則有助於確定貨幣價值下的問責制和透明度具有重大意義(Dooren, 2011)。這認為，如果必須優先採用私人籌資作為採購方法，則評估的三個核心原則。本篇代寫論文 價格文章由美國論文通AssignmentPass輔導網整理，供大家參考閱讀。
However, the issue of policies by several jurisdictions in the utilization of PPPs and private financing have to perceive a significant requirement of testing accountability and transparency. This is crucial to be successful and satisfied with the proposal. In Australia, at the level of federal government, there is huge significance of reiterating that the Principles of Commonwealth for the utilization of private financing helps in the identification of accountability and transparency under the value of money (Dooren, 2011). This perceives the three core principles for the assessment if there must be a preference for private financing as a method of procurement.
As the private sector is increasing, its involvement in delivering public services tends to challenge the traditional notions of perceiving transparency and accountability. It is considered as an issue centralized with good governance. In this context, it has been stated in the Commonwealth Principles (2002, p.11) that:
“The potential for private financing to alter traditional risk allocation also requires close attention to how existing accountability arrangements impact on the relationship between agencies and contractors.”
Partnership arrangements, privatization, and corporatization commonly have been involving the direct control in transfer over the responsible organization for the delivery of public services to the Board of Directors. As recently observed by the Victorian Estimates and Accounts Committee, accountability for spending of government can involve risk if parties participate in arrangements. These arrangements may be the ones where there is no direct accountability to a Minister, and there is no subjectivity with the scrutiny of parliament. It has been further observed by the Committee that the practices and standards of good corporate governance can be considered as significant elements not only to ensure the operation of these boards, but also in the prevention of corruption and fraud.